As part of a ministry curriculum review, a comprehensive list of values to be taught in schools has been put together.
It will bring the 10-year-old curriculum into line with what is already being taught – including honesty, respect and responsibility – in many schools.
But Principals' Federation president Pat Newman, a supporter of values education, said "huge numbers" of children received none at home. It was frustrating schools had to spend so much time on it.
"Unless we can get society to also reflect those values, it is often like hitting your head against a brick wall," he said. "Why is it that schools have to do it?"
Newman said pupils were found fighting in the playground and parents were called to the school, only to back up their children's actions. "It's the parents saying, `We told him to stand up for himself and use his fists'," he said.
"I believe schools have to teach values because somewhere along the line, if we don't, our society is going to get worse than it is."
The list of values will be distributed to schools next year for consultation. A final version will become part of the national curriculum in 2007. Despite a lack of ministry direction in the past, principals say, most schools already teach values because often no-one else is.
The ministry has contracted Waikato University to survey parents and teachers about the importance placed on values.
Ministry senior curriculum manager Mary Chamberlain said teachers wanted more advice on what values to teach. She acknowledged many schools already taught values. "What we're trying to do is make it clearer what the expectation is," she said.
It was expected the new values curriculum would help teachers include values topics in their day-to-day teaching, rather than as separate topics, she said. –
Dominion Post